A recent KQED investigation has brought attention to two whistleblower retaliation lawsuits filed against Berkley Maynard Academy, a North Oakland charter school operated by Aspire Public Schools. The cases, handled by Elana Jacobs, partner at Winer Burritt Scott & Jacobs LLP, allege that school administrators retaliated against educators who raised concerns about failures to provide legally required support for students with disabilities.
The lawsuits center on former assistant principal Iris Velasco and former teacher Maryann Doudna, who say they were punished after speaking up about systemic lapses in special education services, unsafe learning conditions, and noncompliance with state and federal law. Both educators stated they raised concerns to protect students—particularly those with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), English learners, and students from low-income families. According to the lawsuits and reporting, teachers and staff described a campus culture where concerns about students with disabilities were ignored or dismissed, leading to worsening classroom conditions, staff turnover, and students not receiving mandated services.
Velasco alleges she was terminated shortly after filing a whistleblower complaint, while Doudna says she felt forced to leave after repeated pleas for help went unanswered. "Educators are often the first to recognize when schools fail to meet their legal obligations to students," said Jacobs. "When they speak up, they're doing so to protect children's educational rights, not to make trouble." The full KQED investigation can be found at https://www.kqed.org.
Jacobs emphasized that retaliation against educators has consequences far beyond the workplace. "This isn't just a workplace dispute, it's about kids with disabilities, English learners, and low-income families whose rights are being ignored," she said. "If whistleblowers are silenced, families lose their strongest allies inside the system." The article raises broader questions about oversight and accountability in charter schools. "Charter schools are public schools, and they must be held to the same legal standards as any district when it comes to special education compliance and student safety," Jacobs noted. "Aspire markets itself as a champion for equity, but these lawsuits tell a very different story."
For business and technology leaders, these cases highlight critical issues of organizational culture, compliance, and ethical leadership. When systems designed to protect vulnerable populations fail, and those who identify problems face retaliation, it creates significant legal, reputational, and operational risks. The lawsuits underscore the importance of creating environments where employees can report compliance issues without fear, particularly in sectors like education where public trust and student welfare are paramount.
Jacobs says her clients hope their cases prompt meaningful change. "Our clients came forward not just to seek justice for themselves, but to ensure these practices stop so future students and teachers aren't harmed," she said. "We want to encourage a culture where teachers and administrators can speak up about noncompliance and unsafe learning environments without fear of punishment." The lawsuits against Aspire Public Schools are ongoing, with Aspire denying the allegations. More information about the legal firm handling the cases is available at https://www.winerburritt.com.
